Sunday, March 15, 2009

The power of the insignificant

A couple of weeks ago, someone bought a pair of sandals and specs for an obscene amount of money. Suffice to say that the money would have been enough to built schools in over a hundred villages. The reason why it was priced so high is even more baffling given that Gandhi the owner of the revered specs and sandals would have never bothered to pay so much for them. I bet he would have been much happier if 60 crore Indians followed at least one of his principles he fought so much for.
Why is it that people are so passionate about such insignificant things while the workings of great minds are confined to the realms of legends and never brought down to practical mortal levels? Why would the world value Shakespeare’s original manuscripts to millions while the most important thing, his writing, is available at every street corner bookshop? What’s important, the paper or the words?
Maybe, the Kohinoor diamond is worth the money. The piece itself has a value in terms of its rarity and beauty. But Gandhi’s slippers are placed on a pedestal way above all other slippers of the world because it was worn by Gandhi and not because it’s the most beautiful or durable slipper in the world. What is worth the money and time is Gandhi’s ideals, a commodity that’s getting so rare nowadays that soon nothing will be left to even auction even if a buyers wants to pay for it.

4 comments:

Mahi said...

Hey check this article out:

http://www.livemint.com/2009/03/19205624/Gandhi8217s-rescuers-haven.html

you will realize that more people echo your thoughts. :)

j.o. said...

Good thoughts Yavanshi! Hope you are well. Look forward to hearing from you sometime! blessings.

PasserBy said...

Hi,

I happen to got referred to your blogsite through some means...

I was going through your views and could not help share my views as comments...

pardon the liberty...

--------------------------------

Agreed...

Slippers, specatcles, books, diamonds all are what they are... irrespective of their historical links...

But there are certain things one cannot overlook... for instance, the fact that Kohinoor represents the craftmanship, the luxury that prevailed in India several hundred years ago and is very much an element of Indian history and heritage... in that sense, its rightful place now that India has become independent is India, not to be showcased as a precious stone got from one part of British Empire...

It's sad that as a nation we have not retained it....

Agreed Gandhi would have wanted his principles preserved than his belongings'...

But this is more than just his personal belongings'... not following his principles is something else... people either believe in them or they don't. It's their choice...

But whatever is an element of Indian heritage should remain in India and Indians should value it....

Our erstwhile palaces are hotels catering to the rich... while the same in Europe becomes a heritage site. Sad.

Pidog said...

@ PasserBy
I thought Gandhiji stood for universal brotherhood/sisterhood. Also, he was against idolizing anything.
So, should we not stop idolizing Gandhiji's chappals and try to implement the valuesfor which his lived and died??

And about things that are a part of Indian culture staying in India. You can extend the argument to:
We should not have Pizzas and Jeans (Both are a part of the Italian Heritage). We should not be using the English language(Its a part of the British Heritage).